Click here for the latest
open access news
May 18, 2005
|
Under
the prevailing subscription-based system,
commercial publishers own a monopoly over the distribution of scientific
research. They charge authors for the publication of their works, then
charge the readers subscription, advertising, and online access fees; in
addition they retain the copyright of the articles they publish.
Consequently, though the vast majority of the scientific research
is publicly financed by taxpayers dollars, access to research is not
freely and publicly available: it is restricted to customers who can
afford to pay for subscription. In
June 2003, Martin Sabo, a Minnesota congressman, introduced a bill,
entitled the Public
Access to Science Act. The bill addresses several contemporary
controversies in scientific publishing including copyright to published
research material. According
to Sabo’s bill, the works resulting from scientific research
substantially funded by the government, would be excluded from copyright
protection and become public domain. Since scientific research is
largely funded by tax dollars, Sabo said, the results of research should
be freely and immediately available to taxpayers who ultimately pay for conducting
research.
Scholarly
communication is an essential part of the scientific research process.
Not only scientists want to disseminate the results of their work to the
public and their peers but they also need to ensure that their research
findings are original. While
the highlights of scientific discoveries are often described in mass
media, the details of the research studies are largely reported through
journal articles, which make up the bulk of scholarly publishing. In
the past few years, the escalating cost of journals has forced many
individuals and institutions to cancel their subscriptions, thus
excluding large parts of the scientific community from scholarly
interaction especially in the developing countries.
Until recently, many publishers and researchers believed that
there was no better way to disseminate research findings; but in the
late 1990s a few initiatives began exploring the alternatives to
traditional subscription-based standards, launching the idea of a
new publishing model -- Open Access.
|